17
have
to ask whether our concurrence is required for a communique
men
that
My concern is that too much is being done in the whole
g the
the matter. In the circumstances, since we promised further consideration
92
23928 21.
my minute I meant to concur
suggest that we
Since
disputed
Order
4
being
F
the note
the principle of §6 - the point raised is the same as the former
§ 83 of the old Sin?
side-points to § 83
I understood ( Fraser
There is
there
no doubt as to the meaning
If your letter is in support
The
F
entirely.
I had rather talk to you that it was not clear to concur
The point is that they want to issue
bit.
the note at Cohen,
if
able
18-19
ACC
1-
I sent papers
In view of 34092.
$7.0.8 asked me to
back
do nothing, particularly
letter,
In any further communication on this subject, please quote
No. 18667.
and address-
The Under-Secretary of State,
Foreign Office.
London.
Sir:-
0.
29879
14 AUG 02
838
FOREIGN OFFICE
August 13 1906.
I am directed by Secretary Sir E. Grey to state
that consideration has been given to your letter
17303 of the 30th of May in regard to the proposed
amendment of the Hongkong Companies Law with a view
to controlling the publication of seditious matter
in China.
The proposals contained in that letter do not
fully meet the objections previously entertained in
this Department to the amendments proposed, and Sir
E. Grey has adopted the course suggested in the final
paragraph of your letter and as an alternative measure
proposes to take the opportunity afforded by the
preparation of the new Amending China and Corea Order
in Council to insert a clause dealing with this subject.
A copy of the draft Order is enclosed.
Clause
The Under Secretary of State,
Colonial Office.
17
have
zo. ask whether our concurane. for ack wotta a comunsunce
men
that
M- concem
hir meme that too on in the whole
g the
the 0. In C. state, since in promised further caxcccinatin
92
23928 21.
my minute I meant concursed in
suggest that wo
Since
disputed
Order
4
bung
F
the hote
the principle of §6 -the point rod o the forr
§ 83 of the old Sin?
side-pontsanto § 83
I understood ( Fister
There is
ther
meacup
no doubt as to the meaing
If air letter & enpport.
The
F
antinly.
I had halter tall 70. that it. Oncant to concur.
The paint in that they want to issue
bit.
the note at Cohen,
if
afsle
18-19
ACC
1-
I sunt papers
In view of 34092.
$7.0.8 asked the to
back
do nothing, partin
litter,
In any further communica tion on this subject, please quote
No. 18667.
and address-
The Under-Secretary of State,
Foreign Office.
London.
Sir: -
0.
29879
14 AUG 02
838
FOREIGN OFFICE
August 13 1906.
I am directed by Secretary Sir E. Grey to state
that consideration has been given to your letter
17303 of the 30th of May in regard to the proposed
amendment of the Hongkong Companies Law with a view
to controlling the publication of seditious matter
in China.
The proposals contained in that letter do not
fully meet the objections previously entertained in
this Department to the amendments proposed, and Sir
E. Grey has adopted the course suggested in the final
paragraph of your letter and as an alternative meas-
ure proposes to take the opportunity afforded by the
preparation of the new Amending China and Corea Order
in Council to insert a clause dealing with this sub-
ject.
A copy of the draft Order is enclosed.
Clause
he Under Secretary of State,
Colonial Office.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.